Menu

LEX File Exchange
EA Support Files
SC4 Wikipedia
Network Addon Mod
Dependencies
Chat

Author Topic: NAM 37 Release Candidate -- Discussion and Support Thread  (Read 4229 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jeffryfisher

  • Uncle Jeff
  • Forums Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 48
  • Total likes: 51
  • Reputation: 0
  • The most local level of gov't is one citizen
    • Liberating Digital Content
Re: NAM 37 Release Candidate -- Discussion and Support Thread
« Reply #60 on: May 15, 2020, 08:30:59 PM »
I would have noticed if it was like that when I originally laid it out...it may have been laid with NAM 36 and this photo is with 37). Is that the issue - i.e. does it just need relaying with 37?
Choose the track tool and click on any of the old-texture rail. Is your rail all the new texture now?
Modding PC games since 1993 (back when we needed hex-editors)

Offline Wiimeiser

  • Forums Senator
  • *
  • Posts: 637
  • Total likes: 97
  • Reputation: 0
  • Pink horse, pink horse
Re: NAM 37 Release Candidate -- Discussion and Support Thread
« Reply #61 on: May 16, 2020, 08:03:25 AM »
Unless I am somehow mistaken, diagonal FlexRamps and DRIs do not exist, meaning ramps branching off diagonal RHWs require deprecated ramp pieces.

EDIT: I got a diagonal A1 to orthogonal MIS to appear by hovering the first piece of the FlexRamp ring over a diagonal RHW-4, but I'm not sure that's the correct one...

EDIT2: Found them both. But they're missing their Euro textures.

I have another problem: Joining orthogonal MIS to diagonal Road tries to pull a tile ID that doesn't exist on the opposite side, like the code was never written with the possibility of such a T-intersection in mind...
« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 08:34:22 AM by Wiimeiser »
Pink horse, pink horse, she rides across the nation...

Offline roadgeek

Re: NAM 37 Release Candidate -- Discussion and Support Thread
« Reply #62 on: May 16, 2020, 09:55:25 AM »
I think I found a glitch in one of the RHW6S bridges and the RHW 8S bridge:
« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 12:44:33 PM by roadgeek »
Polygamy is Biblical! It really is! The logical fallacies and mental gymnastics people go through, to argue that Scripture speaks against it, are being exposed, one individual at a time. In fact, God commands men to marry the woman they defile, and He made no exception for married men.

Offline Wiimeiser

  • Forums Senator
  • *
  • Posts: 637
  • Total likes: 97
  • Reputation: 0
  • Pink horse, pink horse
Re: NAM 37 Release Candidate -- Discussion and Support Thread
« Reply #63 on: May 22, 2020, 07:49:01 AM »
For some reason RHW-6S isn't appearing in the satellite view.
Pink horse, pink horse, she rides across the nation...

Offline metarvo

  • NAM Team
  • Forums Guru
  • *
  • Posts: 2227
  • Total likes: 194
  • Reputation: 9
  • Wired up!
  • CL: Power to the
    people!
Re: NAM 37 Release Candidate -- Discussion and Support Thread
« Reply #64 on: May 22, 2020, 01:17:47 PM »
It seems as though the FARR-3 no longer works, at least as it did.  Did the drag pattern change?

EDIT: OK, I figured it out.  It requires the FLEX curve to get it started, then the drag pattern applies.  I suppose it does make it less likely to accidentally trigger FARR-3 in a situation where it might not be wanted (e.g. parallel DTR lines).
« Last Edit: May 22, 2020, 01:38:28 PM by metarvo »
Find my power line BAT thread here.
Check out the Noro Cooperative.  What are you waiting for?  It even has electricity.
Want more? Try here.  For even more electrical goodies, look here.
Here are some rural power lines.

Offline LucarioBoricua

Re: NAM 37 Release Candidate -- Discussion and Support Thread
« Reply #65 on: May 25, 2020, 08:50:24 PM »
It seems we have more missing textures at more distant zoom levels. Found an instance with a triple network cell: road/rail grade crossing under elevated rail top road.


Zooms 1 to 4 lack the texture:



Zooms 5 and 6 show the texture just fine:

Offline xxdita

  • Administrator
  • Forums Parliamentarian
  • *
  • Posts: 2000
  • Total likes: 320
  • Reputation: 9
  • CL: Mr. Fixxit
Re: NAM 37 Release Candidate -- Discussion and Support Thread
« Reply #66 on: May 25, 2020, 09:39:35 PM »
Is the documentation still the same as NAM36? read-first-nam36.html has a created date of ‎September ‎13, ‎2017, ‏‎5:30:08 AM. And I don't see any documentation with a more recent date.

Offline dcsmycity

Re: NAM 37 Release Candidate -- Discussion and Support Thread
« Reply #67 on: May 26, 2020, 12:33:18 AM »
I recall seeing something in the new installer disclaiming that the documentation has yet to be updated.

Offline Tarkus

  • Administrator
  • Forums Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 11391
  • Total likes: 4573
  • Reputation: 71
  • NAM Team Tankadillo
    • NAM HQ
  • CL: Dr. PuzzlePiece
Re: NAM 37 Release Candidate -- Discussion and Support Thread
« Reply #68 on: May 26, 2020, 04:11:40 AM »
It's included in the .zip file itself with the installer.  There's a 0-read-first-nam37-rc.html file in there which has pretty much all the stuff to know about NAM 37.  Aside from that, however, little/nothing has been updated as of yet.

-Alex