Show us your...Intersections

Catalyst · June 14, 2016, 01:58:32 AM

Good luck building that with SC4 Terring!!!
I gave it a try with C:S.

link: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=703479400&searchtext=

Terring7 · June 14, 2016, 02:38:40 AM

Very nice recreation

But how much traffic can support? Is it efficient enough for the city?

APSMS · June 14, 2016, 03:09:53 AM

I imagine it's a mess. The image you posted belonged in a Dr. Seuss book, and Catalyst's rendition looks great

, but if C:S simulates weaving, then it will just be a nightmare to drive through.

Not to mention the turnarounds are completely unnecessary.

But, like I said, it looks cool.

dyoungyn · June 14, 2016, 09:25:53 AM

I believe that this type of interchange will accomplish it's goal of eliminating a traffic signal.

When it comes to traffic congestion, well, that is whole new story.

Gugu3 · June 14, 2016, 03:21:34 PM

Excellent interchanges being shown here!

Tarkus · July 17, 2016, 01:59:21 AM

Minor stability fix, major interchange build:

This one's almost possible with stock NAM 34 (the stability where the FLEXFly start is next to the diagonal RHW is the hang up), but 16 lines of code just now fixed that.

Up close and personal with the spaghetti:

Stack interchanges like this, where one of the mainlines goes above all the flyovers are out there--see the Kellogg Interchange and the Four Level Interchange in Southern California (thanks to woodb3kmaster for the research/inspiration).

-Alex

Schohns · July 17, 2016, 09:21:44 AM

@Tarkus: Fantastic!

Smooth curves everywhere, yet very compact.

I built this one today:

Tarkus · July 17, 2016, 01:56:05 PM

Thanks, Schohns, and nice work! That's a nice smooth, well-engineered interchange, and I particularly like the braided setup you have going.

-Alex

Alan_Waters · July 17, 2016, 02:53:31 PM

compdude787 · July 18, 2016, 08:04:10 PM

Wow, that is an awesome interchange, Tarkus!!! I am glad that we can FINALLY build compact stack interchanges!

Haljackey · July 20, 2016, 07:17:32 PM

That's a big sucker.

(click for full size)

eggman121 · July 21, 2016, 12:53:47 AM

Time for my turn

Hope you enjoy!

-eggman121

Gugu3 · July 21, 2016, 02:42:40 AM

Great interchanges both of you!

dyoungyn · July 21, 2016, 01:24:33 PM

Effman,

Great and exciting work. I am noticing some new teasing here. Also notice some new feathers with "One Way" roads and avenues. Will they make the NAM update?

compdude787 · July 21, 2016, 10:04:22 PM

Oh, neat. I guess we could now make a sort of older-style expressway that would have been built in the 40s and 50s and doesn't contain shoulders and other such modern safety features.

dyoungyn · July 22, 2016, 11:07:12 AM

Even more importantly, is it safe to assume they will all be white in the Region View?

metarvo · July 22, 2016, 11:28:50 AM

So, this is the "REW-4."

These ramps are really nice, and the interchange itself has a unique but fully functional design. Keep up the good work!

noahclem · July 22, 2016, 02:26:21 PM

Very interesting! Depending on the footprints and mechanics some neat stuff for urban, signal-controlled, complex intersections could also be possible

j-dub · July 22, 2016, 11:16:37 PM

Spoiler alert!

woodb3kmaster · July 27, 2016, 06:13:52 PM

One of my latest creations (click for full resolution):

This interchange connects the R-5 (north/south) and R-30 (east/west) to Royal Brougham Way (avenue heading west) south of downtown Seattle (rather, my fictional version of it). Ramps to/from Dearborn Street (avenue at top) are also part of this interchange, accessible from either freeway via collector lanes. (Yes, I know there's a tree poking through one of the flyovers. I'll fix it next time.

)