Check out the Best MDs voted by you in the MD Hall of Fame section!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Good stuff Sam ... thanks... what we will do is if there is no challenger in say an houur I or Masochist will dig a past looser out and pitch him again.
I don't like being told how to judge something by a list of criteria, when what is I see is needed is more akin to intuition.
... that whoever has the 10th vote cannot post a picture to challenge the winner.
My 2 pennies (I am British, you know )...This is a PHOTO competition and should be judged on one thing only...Composition. It doesn't matter if the shot has been doctored or is raw, what should matter is the asthetics of the shot and the personal appeal.About ambushing...I'm pretty sure a lot of people are guilty of it (me included, I'm afraid to say) and it is becoming, as Colyn said, a problem where pics are being unfairly knocked out because of it (still about Willowtree)I agree a challenger cannot challenge if he/she has cast the deciding vote...and the runner up may not post another image for at least 2 rounds. This way everyone gets a fair stab irrespective of timezones. Also agree that a clear 3 point lead is required for an image to win...but up to a point. If the voting reaches 20 it has to be decided on a sudden death vote.
As for the Challenger Ambush, enough people have spoken out against it that I'll do something about it...the question is, what? I'm leaning towards the "10th vote, no challenge" option (because I feel that would help eliminate it all together), but maybe you guys would rather have the three-vote system (required to win by three votes)?